Archives: May 2010

Orlando Eslava is having a wonderful life.  He wanted his lender to modify his mortgage.  He wanted more affordable payments.  But, Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Bailey decided to cancel his $207,000 mortgage after HSBC decided to ignore a previous order to post a $414,000 bond.

According to the court transcript, Judge Bailey referred to the actions of HSBC’s attorney, William Huffman, of Tampa-based Florida Default Law Group, as being “contemptuous”.

You can read the transcript, but me… well, I’d like to think that Judge Bailey is from Bedford Falls… and that the guy from HSBC’s law firm is named Mr. Potter.  And that it really is a wonderful life.  Like, maybe it went this way:

Judge Bailey: “You sit around here and you spin your little webs and you think the whole world revolves around you and your money.  Well, it doesn’t, Mr. Potter. In the whole vast configuration of things, I’d say you were nothing but a scurvy little spider.”

It all started back in December 2009, when Judge Bailey granted HSBC’s motion for the foreclosure sale of Mr. Eslava’s condo property. But, apparently HSBC misplaced the note on Eslava’s property, and Bailey ordered the lender to post a $414,000 bond that would indemnify Mr. Eslava in the event another lender showed up with a subsequent claim against the same condo property.  In other words, in case it turned out that HSBC wasn’t the only holder of the note, or not the holder at all.

HSBC and Florida Default, according to the court records, chose to ignore Judge Bailey’s order, didn’t post the bond by April 2nd, as ordered, and quite defiantly went ahead with the foreclosure and an April 9th sale that conveniently ended up with HSBC having the title to Eslava’s condo.

Eslava hired a lawyer and went to court saying that the lender violated Bailey’s court order, and therefore the court should invalidate the sale.  At the hearing held on May 6, 2010, Judge Bailey dismissed the foreclosure case with prejudice, which means that HSBC can’t sue Eslava again.  But the best part is that the judge not only ordered HSBC to return title of the condo to Eslava, but also zeroed out the mortgage in its entirety. Eslava now owns his condo free and clear.

Judge Bailey: “What is it you want, Orlando? What do you want? You want the condo? Just say the word and I’ll throw a lasso around it and pull it down.  Hey. that’s a pretty good idea. I’ll give you the condo, Orlando.”


Not only that, but according to a transcript of the hearing, in addition to tearing up the mortgage, Judge Bailey also reprimanded Huffman: “Some day, this foreclosure crisis is going to be over, and you need to decide what kind of lawyer you are going to be.  Because at the end of the day, you are responsible for your client’s compliance with court orders.”

Oooh, snap! Judge Bailey: (Yelling at Mr. Potter-Huffman) “Where’s that note, you silly stupid old fool?  Where’s that bond? Do you realize what this means?  It means returning the title and scandal and no mortgage. That’s what it means. One of us is going to look stupid – well, it’s not gonna’ be me.”

Huffman tried to apologize, saying his client failed to post the bond ordered by the judge because he misunderstood the order, again according to the court transcript, and don’t we all hate it when that happens.

I just want to test something out… let’s just see… POST A BOND… Stop… DO NOT FORECLOSE UNTIL YOU DO… Stop… YOU DON’T HAVE THE NOTE, SO WE CAN’T BE SURE YOU OWN IT… Stop… DON’T SELL LOANS IN THE MIDDLE OF HAMP MODIFICATIONS… Stop… BE A HUMAN BEING… Stop.

In response to Huffman’s apologies, Judge Bailey, who led the Florida Supreme Court Foreclosure Taskforce, replied: “I don’t want apologies, I want performance. I want responsible attorneys who meet the basic standards of knowing what is going on in their files.”  Judge Bailey also criticized the lenders and their lawyers for their overall “chaos and disorganization”.

(On a side note: “Judge Bailey… Will you marry me?  Love, Mandelman)

A residential agent in Sunny Isles Beach, Florida, Eslava says he fell behind on his mortgage payments when the housing market went into a free fall and commissions became few and far between. He told the press that he never even thought about his mortgage being canceled, he only wanted more time to negotiate with his bank.

“I wanted to lower the payments because I want to keep my home … this is my home,” said Eslava. He said he spent thousands of dollars to repair the unit after Hurricane Wilma in 2005.

Eslava began his journey into the Loan Modification Zone last November when HSBC placed him into a “trial modification,” the first phase in the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP).  His monthly payments went from $1,800 to $620 during what was supposed to be, but almost never is, a three-month trial.  Lenders claim they have the three months to decide whether the borrower actually qualifies for the modification, which is very much like the way it used to work when you could qualify to originate a mortgage in the time it took for your car to be run through an automatic car wash.

The HAMP guidelines state that if borrowers make all three payments on time and as agreed, they will receive a permanent modification, but I don’t think they use the word “will” the same way the rest of us do.

He just continued to make the $620 payment to HSBC, so my guess would be that sometime after the fourth month, which is when HSBC would have been able to sell Eslava’s loan as “performing,” to another investor, and therefore get the highest possible price for it… the bank sold his condo.

“It is not infrequent,” said Arden Shank, executive director and president of Neighborhood Housing Services of South Florida in Miami. “We worked with families who had that happen to them.”

You did?  Not infrequent?  Oh, for the love of… Mr. Shank, why can’t you tell the truth about this situation?  Although I suppose it’s possible that when you say something is “not infrequent,” you actually mean that it’s downright commonplace.

Then the story went on… to prove my point:

The agency recently helped another family obtain a loan modification in Miami-Dade County, but the lender did not cancel the foreclosure sale. Four months ago, the family lost the house in an auction. They got the title back after Neighborhood Housing hired a lawyer who convinced a judge to overturn the sale.

Can they, Mr. Shank?  You mean it’s possible?  Might happen?  Could be?  Well, Shank-you very much for shaying so.  (So, I’m like  15… so what?  I know I am, but what are you?)

“If lenders are implementing the HAMP program and then their two different departments don’t communicate and don’t know what each other is doing, then that is kind of problem in implementing HAMP,” Shank said.

That’s true, Mr. Shank.  Of course, it’s also at least somewhat problematic when all the departments at a lender think that they are above the law, ignore a judge’s order, con a homeowner into making four trial payments knowing that they intend to sell the loan as a result, even while that homeowner is under consideration for HAMP… those things are also quite the problem, right?  I mean, in addition to departments not communicating, right Mr. Shank?

How about a little more sheer joy and wonderment from Judge Bailey: “You are filing pleadings in court every day and you don’t even know what’s going on with the case,” she told Huffman, the HSBC lawyer. “In no other species or kind of law would that be remotely acceptable, or frankly, anything short of malpractice.  But somehow in Foreclosure World everybody thinks that is just fine, that you can know absolutely nothing about your files and walk in here and ask judges for things left and right without even knowing what’s going on.”

Ding, ding!

Zuzu Mandelman: Look, Daddy. Teacher says, every time a bell rings an angel gets her wings.

Mandelman: That’s right, honey, that’s absolutely right!


The Real George Bailey (Jimmy Stewart) in “It’s a Wonderful Life…”

Richard Simpson

rsimpson05@bellsouth.net   call 770-623-6341 for help

iStock_000012725881XSmallOne of the biggest reasons people don’t default and chop off the massive negative equity they are burdened with is the fear that they won’t be able to buy a home again in the near future.  This is changing rapidly.

First, Fannie Mae announced that as of July 1, 2010 they will begin lending to homeowners who went through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or a short sale after as little as 2 years.  Washington Post Reported:

Instead, it could be as little as two years. In a bulletin to lenders April 14, mortgage giant Fannie Mae said it is relaxing rules that prevented loan applicants who have participated in short sales or deeds in lieu of foreclosure from obtaining a new mortgage for extended periods of time. The new rules are scheduled to take effect July 1.

Foreign entrepreneurs may start lending:  In a Zach Fox article on SNL.com called “A bank that only lends to walk-aways?”

Zingales’ comments, which did not quite fit into the Block’s rundown on strategic default risks, suggest foreign entrepreneurs could play a large role with a new type of bank: a lender that specializes in giving new mortgages to high-credit quality borrowers who walked away from an underwater property.

Without legacy assets, the bank would have no fear of encouraging strategic default or cannibalizing its customer base.

“That would really be gasoline on the fire. The main reason why people don’t [walk away] is because they think they will have a very hard time getting a house in the future,” Zingales said. “But if somebody comes and says, ‘You know what, you have always had a good credit, you’re in a bad situation today, I’m sort of going to give you that offer,’ then I think [strategic default] might become irresistible.”

If you were caught in an adjustable rate mortgage, a credit union may allow you to buy again after only 6 months! www.DailyFinance.com

California, Golden 1 Credit Union’s Mortgage Repair Loan is targeted to people who have been been in a foreclosure in the last six to 18 months. It advertises that it’ll will help you buy a home sooner than you expect.

I expect this to keep happening more and more.  Big lenders like Chase used to lend at good rates only 1 year after foreclosure.  I think you will see lenders quickly have a big change of heart as more people elect to do a strategic default.  If they don’t, foreign lenders out there will and the US lenders will wish they had.

Richard Simpson  rsimpson2010@live.com

770-623-6341

The use of credit scoring is vital to the mortgage underwriting process.  However, behind the scenes, a war is raging over who can lay claim to that process, with one party recently losing ground in the courtroom.

The Fair Isaac Corp. (FICO: 23.25 -0.90%) was denied a new trial regarding what it claims is clearly its trademark; that is, the act of rating an individual’s credit on a scale of 300 to 850.

However, VantageScore Solutions, the credit rating provider created by America’s three major credit reporting companies — Equifax (EFX: 32.59 -0.64%), Experian and TransUnion — successfully argued that its system that rates credit on a scale between 501 to 990, is not in violation of the FICO trademark.

The presiding US district judge in Minnesota, Ann Montgomery, went a step further and called for FICO’s trademark to be invalidated in her verdict.

In her decision, Montgomery addressed the jury’s finding stating, “Indeed, the jury’s verdict was a wholesale, unambiguous rejection of Fair Isaac’s central theory of the case — i.e., that one can legitimately claim trademark protection in the numerical range for credit scores.”

VantageScore Solutions CEO Barrett Burns said that the court’s decision confirms its longstanding allegation that FICO’s claims are “meritless,” and “at every step, VantageScore has prevailed against Fair Isaac’s claims.”

“Should FICO appeal, we remain confident we will prevail there too,” Burns said.

And FICO has the full intention of appealing, according to Craig Watts, a director of public affairs at Fair Issac. As to be expected, he said that FICO strongly disagrees with Montgomery’s verdict.

Watts added that the basic tenants of the case surround fairness and consumer protection, not against the numerical methodology for presenting that value, especially as it pertains to the sale of those scores to mortgage lenders, for example.

“Nothing has changed as a result of this order,” he said, “the defendants have not been held accountable for copying what it took FICO 20 years to build; and consumers will continue to be victims of big-budget ad campaigns that trick them into buying knock-off scores that they think are the genuine FICO scores lenders use to make decisions.”

Write to Richard Simpson at rsimpson2010@live.com

I object Your Honor

CameronBaxterFilms09 — January 09, 2010 — The difference between evidence and information as it applies in the courtroom. Neil Garfield MBA JD, Wall Street insider and former trial attorney, is the editor of http://www.LivingLies.Wordpress.com, the leading internet resource on foreclosure defense. In this informative 3-part presentation Neil leads the viewer through the Steps to Freedom from desperation to hope. Neil has just released a 2-disk, 4-hour DVD set -

  • Last week I received an email from a desperate couple in Illinois. Here’s the edited version of their note:

“My wife and I have been struggling, morally, with what to do. We have two interest-only, adjustable-rate mortgages with two different lenders coming due in May of 2011. I currently can handle paying all my bills–but just barely, with nothing left over for replenishing of the emergency fund, or even my kids’ college savings.

In one year, when those adjustable rate mortgages adjust, it’s a different story. The home is now worth about 70% of the loan values. We do not want to stay in the home and have been trying to be proactive about doing something before the rates adjust. My lenders both said that if I do a short sale they would definitely make me sign a promissory note (for the deficiency). That defeats our purpose, so it is not an option for us. Bankruptcy attorneys have told me I make too much money to file for Chapter 7. I am currently employed. Last June I lost my previous job, and squandered our savings to stay above water with bills and the mortgages. Hindsight is 20/20 and at the time I should have filed for Chapter 7.

So, I am considering just letting the home go to foreclosure, saving my money, paying off other smaller debts (such as credit cards, and car loan), but am hesitant. I want/need to do the right thing fiscally for my family, but am wavering on the fence as to just take the plunge or not in a strategic foreclosure.

What should we do?”

These people are far from alone. Millions of middle-class Americans today are in a similar situation. They are struggling with their mortgage payments, and cannot sell because they are a long way underwater, owing more on their home than it is worth. They have wiped out their savings trying to keep up. One worker in six is either unemployed or underemployed, and there is a tsunami of rate resets coming in the next two years.

No one forced them to borrow –but no one forced the banks to lend either. More important right now is how they get out of it. I took this conundrum to two experienced bankruptcy attorneys–Richard Nemeth in Cleveland and Jeffrey Tromberg in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.–for their advice. Here are some thoughts they offered.

1. Put those suitcases down! Stop and take a deep breath. Sure, you could just walk away from the home today. There is a decent chance the banks won’t come after you for the shortfall either. And, as I’ve written before, the issue is not really a moral one. But you should first make sure you explore all your options to make sure you do it right.

2. Find out if you are eligible for help from the federal government. If your lender won’t modify the loan or agree to wipe out the deficiency through a short sale, Uncle Sam may still help you. The Making Home Affordable program was signed into law by President Obama last year. It hasn’t achieved as much as some may have hoped, but it has still helped some homeowners. The program offers mortgage modification and refinancing for some homeowners who are struggling, but there are conditions. The Department of Housing & Urban Development also offers help and advice on avoiding foreclosure: Details can be found here.

3. Get another legal opinion. You say you’ve spoken to bankruptcy attorneys, but were they specialists? Bankruptcy law in the U.S. like something out of Charles Dickens, even though it was just rewritten a few years ago. It’s convoluted, self-contradictory, and complex. The laws vary from state to state, and case law is changing almost weekly. It’s just five years since Congress passed sweeping legal changes, and many of the new rules are only getting road tested now. You may get different answers from different experts. Even those who pushed for the law, such as the lending industry, have been surprised at how some of it has worked out. It’s worth making sure your counsel knows the minutiae. The National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA.org) should be able to help you find a local specialist.

4. Double-check to see if you can still squeeze under the bar for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Chapter 7 is probably the simplest way to clear your debts, walk away and start again. I know you say you’ve been told that you earn too much to qualify. The 2005 law made qualification much tougher. But the new means test is actually far less restrictive than many people–including many attorneys–think. It allows some pretty generous exclusions from your gross income. You are, for example, allowed to deduct some pension and 401(k) contributions. You are also allowed to deduct charitable donations up to 15% of your gross income, though you have to demonstrate some history of these contributions. Make sure your counsel is experienced at bankruptcy filings and has fully explored how you might be able to make these work for you.

5. Realize that even if you can’t file now, that may change. The means test also excludes mortgage payments from your income. So even if you earn too much to file for Chapter 7 today you may do so when the mortgage rates reset. Mr. Nemeth says that the bankruptcy laws contain some peculiar loopholes you need to know about. For example, they may actually reward you for falling behind on your mortgage payments. That’s because your mortgage arrears will help reduce your effective income for the purposes of the means test–even if you plan to walk away from the home. Crazy? Yes. But blame the lenders. This is the law they, um, lobbied for.

6. Understand how a Chapter 13 might help you after all. Chapter 13 is “bankruptcy lite,” for those whose income is too high to qualify for a Chapter 7. It involves a debt repayment plan (it’s something like the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process used by corporations, though not as generous). In Chapter 13, the courts work out how much of your unsecured debts you can reasonably repay and set up a schedule to repay it.

Chapter 13 will not reduce the value of your primary mortgage. But make sure your counsel understands a little-known gap in the law that can help distressed homeowners who either have two mortgages, or one mortgage and a home equity line on top. If the property value has fallen so far that the primary mortgage is now under water, the courts can rule that the second mortgage is now an unsecured loan. And that, miraculously, means they can modify it. An example: You take out a $200,000 first mortgage and $50,000 second mortgage to buy a home for $250,000. The home then falls in value to $180,000. As that’s not even enough to cover the first mortgage completely, the second mortgage now has no collateral against it at all. The court, in most jurisdictions, can now modify that second mortgage the way they could other unsecured debt, such as a credit card payment.That could include reducing it to zero.

0316roi

0316roi

7. Keep contributing to your 401(k), IRA and 529 plans. It’s very easy in a crisis to stop thinking about the distant future. After all, you’ve got your hands full dealing with today. But this is a dangerous reaction. Why? Because money invested in a qualified retirement plan, and in 529 college savings plans under some circumstances, enjoy substantial legal privilege. They can be sheltered from creditors in bankruptcy. And the contributions may actually help you qualify for bankruptcy–as mentioned above. But the earlier you start making these contributions, and the longer you have been making them, the more respect the courts are likely to give them. Mr. Tromberg’s advice: “If both parents are working, I would contact the HR or 401(k) coordinator at work and say ‘I’d like to max out my contributions today.’”

8. If all else fails? There are not always easy answers. If there really is no way to make use of Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, you may indeed decide just to walk away from your mortgage and let the chips fall where they may. You have already made valiant efforts to keep up your payments. You are absolutely right to put your family’s finances first. But do explore the implications fully. Specialist knowledge can help. For example in some states the lenders have a very limited time to file legal papers for the arrears. And in many cases they are so swamped that they aren’t even bothering. And before walking you should also at least consider ceasing payments on your mortgage but staying in the home. Many mortgage lenders have made this crisis worse by refusing to sit down with borrowers to strike a deal. Alas, they may react better to a stopped check than a polite phone call.

Write to Richard Simpson for more information rsimpson2010@live.com

Fannie never had an official policy about how they would treat people who had a short sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure in their past.

If a person gave back their home to the lender, prior to it going thru the long foreclosure process, Fannie says they will consider giving another loan after 2 years, a maximum of 80% LTV (20% down payment) and re-established credit.

If home was a short-sale, it’s 4 years, and 90% LTV (or 10% down payment) OR 7 years and minimum down payment. (5%).  It’s the time versus the money thing.

Let’s talk about re-establishing credit after a short sale or deed-in-lieu.  In addition to these below, the minimum credit scores must be met (varies between lenders)

1. Waiting period is defined as from the date of the short-sale/deed,  to the date of application

2. Must receive automated underwriting approval

3. Establish “traditional” credit thru banks, finance and credit cards

Real Estate Agents should let their clients (who have or are selling home with short-sale) of the waiting time periods too.

Facing foreclosure? 9 options

Check your options, get help, be realistic — and most of all, don’t dawdle.

Real estate markets are slowing. Interest rates are ticking up. And the phones are ringing at ByDesign, a Los Angeles-based credit counselor, as homeowners start to panic about not being able to make their mortgage payments.

“The number of people asking for appointments to talk about foreclosure is definitely up,” said Susan Ulaga, the nonprofit service’s senior vice president of counseling. Rising rates “are really putting a crunch” on homeowners with adjustable-rate loans.

Nearly a quarter of the nation’s mortgages have rates scheduled to reset this year or next, which means higher payments for millions of homeowners. How many will default isn’t known, but the Mortgage Bankers Association, which tracks delinquencies and foreclosures, expects a “modest” uptick in both by the end of the year.

If you’re in danger of falling behind on your mortgage, or if you’re already delinquent, it’s important to know what’s ahead and what your options are. Usually, the faster you move, the more choices you’ll have about your financial future.

The timeline

30 days: Your troubles actually start as soon as you miss a single payment. Lenders may not contact you until you’ve skipped a second payment, but most will report the first late payment and every subsequent delinquency to the credit bureaus. Even a single late payment can devastate your credit score, the three-digit number that lenders use to help gauge your creditworthiness. Each subsequent “late” further decreases your score, making it more difficult and expensive to get a loan or a refinance that might help your situation. In addition, lenders typically tack on late fees of 5% or so for each missed payment.

90 days to one year: Eventually, if the payments aren’t made, the lender will file a “notice of default” with a local courthouse and send you a letter saying that the foreclosure process will start unless you make good the missing payments.

Home financing © CorbisThe worst kind of debt: groceries

How quickly the notice is filed depends on the individual lender. Some hold off if you contact them to work out a payment plan or otherwise explain your situation. Others are more aggressive and start the process as soon as possible to try to protect their investment.

“They may do it as early as 90 days, or as late as a year,” explained Anthony Hsieh, president of LendingTree.com. “It really depends on the lender’s temperament.”

Usually, this notice means that the amount you owe has shot up as well, since the lender typically adds substantial fees to cover its legal costs.

The notice of default “is a big threshold,” Hsieh said. “Once you get into that state, it’s a whole different world. Your options are fewer.”

The notice of default is generally picked up by the credit bureaus, further depressing your credit score and making refinancing the loan extremely difficult.

(In addition, the notice tips off scam artists that you’re in trouble and may be vulnerable to various “equity skimming” schemes. One common ploy: The scam artist promises to take over your payments, but instead rents out your house and keeps the rent payments as pure profit. The home goes into foreclosure, your credit is trashed and you’ve lost any equity you had in the home.)

90 days more: Borrowers typically have 90 days from the notice of default to make up the deficit before the lender sends out a “notice of sale,” which sets a sale date for the house (typically within the next 15 to 30 days).

Some lenders will allow you to keep your original loan if you can make up the missing payments plus any late fees and legal charges. Others will insist you refinance with another lender. You can also halt the foreclosure, at least temporarily, by filing a lawsuit or filing for bankruptcy. For either legal option to work, you’ll have to be able to come up with a payment plan to fix the deficit.

Your options

Lenders today typically offer a variety of solutions for people who have fallen behind on their mortgages. Among them:
  • Temporarily reducing or waiving payments.

 

  • Setting up short-term repayment plans to help you make up the deficit.

 

  • Adding the unpaid balance to the principal of your loan and increasing your payments slightly to cover the extra amount.