Tags: Credit counseling

Just Filed My Chapter 7 Case – Now What?

Richard AvatarWith many clients, once the attorney and client have reviewed the bankruptcy petition, schedules, statements, worksheets and calculations, and their case is ready to file, I am often met with a perplexed look and a question:  ”So what happens next?”What happens next is a flurry of deadlines and court control dates, some of which require the client’s participation (such as responding to the Trustee’s requests for additional information), some do not require the client’s participation, and others may require the attorney’s participation, depending on how the case progresses.

Often, the client is overwhelmed with the detail and the numerous dates, and simply wants to know that they will get their discharge in “about four months”. However, some clients with more complex cases appreciate the added detail, which is why we have added a convenient Chapter 7 Timeline to our website.

The new addition allows a client or prospective client to input their Chapter 7 Filing Date and Section 341(a) hearing date (if known), and will output a scaled timeline with the important dates. Links to the relevant portions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure are also included for cross reference at the bottom of the timeline page.

We hope this tool will help clients, prospective clients and attorneys alike better understand and navigate the meticulous and often trap-ridden world of bankruptcy law.

Richard Simpson

770-623-6341 Desk

404-788-4420 Cell

rsimpson05@bellsouth.net

People Helping People info

Click on this link to see video

or Listen to a 4 minute call at 646-222-0327

Check out my web site

http://www.teamgg.com/peoplez.html

People Helping People Presentation

When Uruguay striker Luis Suarez raised his hands to block a sure goal from the opposing Ghana side, he committed a foul and paid the penalty — but Uruguay won the game and Ghana’s World Cup team packed its bags.

Suarez got a red card that removed him from the game and suspended him from the semifinal that Uruguay got to play thanks to his unsportsmanlike conduct. There is no goaltending rule in soccer, and Ghana failed to make the ensuing penalty kick and then lost the overtime penalty shootout.

Suarez and Uruguay earned universal opprobrium, but, hey, all the rules were applied and they won the game. “Truth is, it was worth it,” a grinning Suarez said after the game.

Richard AvatarIn thwarting the extension of unemployment benefits, Senate Republicans are playing with Uruguayan tactics, manipulating the rules in a brazenly unsportsmanlike attempt to win the game at any cost.
AM Report: Jobless benefits spark fierce debate

Jobless benefits are leading to a fierce debate: Do they prompt jobless workers to be pickier in their searches? Or is employment insurance a prudent response to the worst recession in decades?

Using the pernicious filibuster rule, the minority party is breaking with a long tradition of automatically providing federal support in times of high unemployment, imposing further hardships on thousands of families.

It is bad politics, bad economics, and just plain nasty, but Republicans are clearly intent on sabotaging the Obama administration no matter what the cost to individual Americans.

The Republican objections about not wanting to extend unemployment unless it is “funded” because they don’t want enlarge the federal deficit are bogus and hypocritical. They never hesitated to add to the deficit when it was a question of tax cuts for the wealthy, estimated to have cost $2 trillion over six years. The $35.5 billion for the unemployment benefits is negligible compared to that figure.

Sacrificing such a relatively small expenditure on the altar of fiscal rectitude really does turn deficit hawks into deficit terrorists, to use economist Bill Mitchell’s phrase. To insist on this sacrifice when unemployment is at nearly 10% and Treasury yields are at historic lows is truly foul play.

No less an authority than Mark Zandi, the Moody’s economist who was one of John McCain’s economic advisers during his presidential campaign, said it is vital to extend the benefits regardless of the deficit. The risk of a double-dip recession by not extending them more than outweighs any harm done through a short-term blip in the deficit, Zandi said in congressional testimony last week.

The denial of unemployment benefits to hard-pressed Americans is just the latest tactic in the Republican’s scorched earth strategy.

“Paying for it…should not be a precondition for Congress to provide more financial help to unemployed workers, strapped states and municipalities, and small businesses looking to expand,” Zandi told the House Budget Committee. “A larger near-term federal deficit is not an economic problem.”

Congress can offset the expenditure a couple of years from now, “when the economy is in full swing,” said this economist, whom no one has ever accused of pandering to the left.

But the unprecedented denial of unemployment benefits to hard-pressed Americans — make no mistake, children are going hungry as a result — is just the latest tactic in Republicans’ scorched earth strategy designed to maximize their political gain in the November midterm elections.

It’s a cruel and cynical strategy that could well backfire, even though it victimizes some of the weakest and most disenfranchised sectors of the electorate.

The Republicans are evidently counting on the rage of voters hurt by the economy to be targeted at the Democratic majority, but people aren’t that stupid. They know that the Senate Republicans — and the unfathomable Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson — are the ones who blocked the aid.

Matthew Kaminski of The Wall Street Journal cited the Suarez incident as well as some of the big refereeing gaffes in the World Cup competition as the reason why Americans don’t like soccer — it violates our sense of fair play.

And yet the Republican strategy of winning at any cost — any cost to the American people, any cost to the common weal — is a much greater violation of any sense of fair play, with much graver consequences.

The Netherlands handily defeated Uruguay in the semifinal and his red card was the last action Suarez saw in the contest. If the American sense of fair play kicks in this November, a number of Republicans may be looking at their own red cards

Bank of America (BAC: 15.81 -0.50%) is starting to forgive principal when modifying underwater mortgages eligible for the National Homeownership Retention Program (NHRP).

BofA servicers will forgive principal for homeowners who owe “considerably more” on their mortgage than the current value of the home while being considered for the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). BofA announced NHRP in March 2010.

The bank will attempt a principal reduction as the first step in the servicer waterfall to reach the 31% debt-to-income ratio target – the amount of the borrower monthly income that goes toward the mortgage. Loans eligible for the NHRP include subprime, pay-option adjustable rate mortgages (ARM) and prime-quality two-year hybrid ARMs originated by Countrywide before Jan. 1, 2009. The amount of principal owed must exceed the property value by 20%, and the loan must be delinquent by 60 or more days.

Through the five-year NHRP, BofA sets up an interest-free forbearance account for the amount of principal owed above the current value of the home. For instance, if the borrower owes $250,000 on a home worth $200,000 and qualifies for the program, BofA will set up a separate account of $50,000 that will sit alone without collecting interest while the borrower makes payments on the $200,000 at the current market interest rate. There are no required payments on the $50,000 non-interest bearing mortgage account.

For the first three years of the NHRP, BofA reduces the separate account – the $50,000 in the example above – by 20% each year if the borrower remains current. Meaning after three years, $30,000 would be forgiven in the example. If, by then, house prices have gone up and the borrower is once again at a 100% loan-to-value ratio, BofA will no longer reduce the principal. If the borrower remains above 100% LTV, BofA will continue reducing payments for an additional two years.

BofA will not reduce the principal on the non-interest bearing mortgage account if the sum of both mortgages achieves 100% LTV.

“We believe the loss [through NHRP] will be smaller compared to foreclosure,” said Jack Schakett, credit loss mitigation executive for BofA Home Loans.

The Treasury Department announced a similar earned principal forgiveness program for HAMP that will go into effect later in the year. But it ends after three years, opposed to the five-year possibility offered by BofA. Schakett said about 80% of the borrowers in the NHRP will not need to receive principal forgiveness after three years.

Schakett added that of the BofA borrowers currently moving through the HAMP process, 45% had an LTV of more than 120%.

“Our tests have shown that many homeowners who are severely underwater on their mortgages will respond positively to a modification offer that includes reduction of their principal balance, increasing the rates of acceptance of HAMP trial modification offers, conversion to permanent modifications and long-term success of the homeowner,” Schakett said.

Schakett said the amount of borrowers who have strategically defaulted is more than they’ve ever experienced before. To meet the demand for modifications, BofA more than doubled its staff in the loss-mitigation department to reach out to these borrowers. The bank also opened the first of three “outreach” centers in Nevada, joining similar centers in California and Florida.

Tags: , ,



UNDERWATER HOMEOWNERS AND THE ECONOMY
In a recent report, Mustafa Akcay, of Moody’s Economy.com masterfully outlined the delicate relation between underwater homeowners and the recovery of the US economy.
Moody’s expect about 4 million homeowners to enter foreclosure in 2010 with failed loan modifications further depressing home prices. This drives their call for additional housing rescue programs.
Here are their four reasons why underwater homeowners pose a risk to the US recovery:
1. Negative equity has become an important driver to foreclosures.

2. The number of underwater homeowners, though declining, is still critically high.

3. The Loss of home equity undermines consumer spending and depresses house prices.

4. The US economic expansion will remain fragile as long as the housing market remains vulnerable.

Moody’s Economy.com estimates:
� 14.9 million homeowners, one-third of all mortgage borrowers, owed more than the market value of their homes at the end of 2009.

� This is 1.2 million lower than the peak in Q2 2009.

� More than 9 million homeowners� loan-to-value was above 120% by the end of last year.

� Mortgage outstanding in negative equity at the end of 2009 totaled $2.5 trillion nationwide.

� More than of mortgages outstanding might be at risk of defaulting.

� Total amount of negative equity was $900 billion at the end of last year.

� States with once-hot housing markets have the largest volume of negative equity.

� Underwater homeowners owe $254 billion in negative equity in California and $88 billion in Florida.

� In Nevada, 80% of mortgage loans were under water at the end of 2009, with Arizona and California following close behind.

� By the end of 2009 1.6 million homeowners in California had loan-to-value ratios above 120%, followed by Florida with 1.1 million and Michigan with 560,000.

� Michigan is the only hard hit state that did not experience a housing bubble, job losses brought values down.

Mustafa Akcay summarizes, “Home prices will remain depressed at least until 2012, with some tentative decline in the second half of 2010 and in 2011, keeping the number of negative equity homeowners high for some time.”
“The downside risk for strategic defaults is that lenders more aggressively seek repayment. In that case, underwater borrowers who are able to service their mortgage debt would be discouraged from defaulting, and strategic defaults would constitute a smaller share of all foreclosures.�”

Key Economic Reports Released This Week

RELEASE
DATE
ECONOMIC
INDICATORS
RELEASED
BY
CONSENSUS Wt. INFLUENCE ON
INTEREST RATES
Tue 06/01
10:00 am et
ISM (NAPM) Mfg
for May ‘10
National Association of Purchasing Mgt. 60.0%
** �If above consensus
�If below consensus
Tue 06/01
10:00 am et
Construction Spending
for April ‘10
Bureau of the Census
Dept. of Commerce
-0.8%
** �If above consensus
�If below consensus
Wed 06/02
7:00 am et
MBA Mtg Apps Survey
for week ending 05/28
Mortgage Bankers Association of America N/A
* Undetermined
Wed 06/02
10:00 am et
Pending Home Sales
for April ‘10
National Association
of Realtors
8.0%
** If above consensus
If below consensus
Wed 06/02
Motor Vehicle Sales
for May ‘10
Automobile Manufacturers Vechiles 11.4M
** Undetermined
Thu 06/03
8:15 am et
ADP Employment Report
for May ‘10
Automatic Data Proc &
Macroeconomic Advisors
100K
** If above consensus
If below consensus
Thu 06/03
8:30 am et
Jobless Claims
for week ending 05/29
Bur. of Labor Statistics
Department of Labor
445K
* �If above consensus
�If below consensus
Thu 06/03
8:30 am et
Productivity & Costs
Q1 ‘10 revised
Labor Department Prod 4.2%
Costs -2.2%
** �If above consensus
�If below consensus
Thu 06/03
10:00 am et
Factory Orders
for April ‘10
Bureau of the Census
Dept. of Commerce
1.5%
* �If above consensus
�If below consensus
Thu 06/03
10:00 am et
ISM Index (Non-Mfg)
for May ‘10
National Association of Purchasing Mgt. 56.0%
** �If above consensus
�If below consensus
Fri 06/04
8:30 am et
Employment Situation
for May ‘10
Bur. of Labor Statistics
Department of Labor
Payrolls 600k
Umemp 9.8%
**** �If above consensus
�If below consensus

iStock_000012725881XSmallOne of the biggest reasons people don’t default and chop off the massive negative equity they are burdened with is the fear that they won’t be able to buy a home again in the near future.  This is changing rapidly.

First, Fannie Mae announced that as of July 1, 2010 they will begin lending to homeowners who went through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or a short sale after as little as 2 years.  Washington Post Reported:

Instead, it could be as little as two years. In a bulletin to lenders April 14, mortgage giant Fannie Mae said it is relaxing rules that prevented loan applicants who have participated in short sales or deeds in lieu of foreclosure from obtaining a new mortgage for extended periods of time. The new rules are scheduled to take effect July 1.

Foreign entrepreneurs may start lending:  In a Zach Fox article on SNL.com called “A bank that only lends to walk-aways?”

Zingales’ comments, which did not quite fit into the Block’s rundown on strategic default risks, suggest foreign entrepreneurs could play a large role with a new type of bank: a lender that specializes in giving new mortgages to high-credit quality borrowers who walked away from an underwater property.

Without legacy assets, the bank would have no fear of encouraging strategic default or cannibalizing its customer base.

“That would really be gasoline on the fire. The main reason why people don’t [walk away] is because they think they will have a very hard time getting a house in the future,” Zingales said. “But if somebody comes and says, ‘You know what, you have always had a good credit, you’re in a bad situation today, I’m sort of going to give you that offer,’ then I think [strategic default] might become irresistible.”

If you were caught in an adjustable rate mortgage, a credit union may allow you to buy again after only 6 months! www.DailyFinance.com

California, Golden 1 Credit Union’s Mortgage Repair Loan is targeted to people who have been been in a foreclosure in the last six to 18 months. It advertises that it’ll will help you buy a home sooner than you expect.

I expect this to keep happening more and more.  Big lenders like Chase used to lend at good rates only 1 year after foreclosure.  I think you will see lenders quickly have a big change of heart as more people elect to do a strategic default.  If they don’t, foreign lenders out there will and the US lenders will wish they had.

Richard Simpson  rsimpson2010@live.com

770-623-6341

The use of credit scoring is vital to the mortgage underwriting process.  However, behind the scenes, a war is raging over who can lay claim to that process, with one party recently losing ground in the courtroom.

The Fair Isaac Corp. (FICO: 23.25 -0.90%) was denied a new trial regarding what it claims is clearly its trademark; that is, the act of rating an individual’s credit on a scale of 300 to 850.

However, VantageScore Solutions, the credit rating provider created by America’s three major credit reporting companies — Equifax (EFX: 32.59 -0.64%), Experian and TransUnion — successfully argued that its system that rates credit on a scale between 501 to 990, is not in violation of the FICO trademark.

The presiding US district judge in Minnesota, Ann Montgomery, went a step further and called for FICO’s trademark to be invalidated in her verdict.

In her decision, Montgomery addressed the jury’s finding stating, “Indeed, the jury’s verdict was a wholesale, unambiguous rejection of Fair Isaac’s central theory of the case — i.e., that one can legitimately claim trademark protection in the numerical range for credit scores.”

VantageScore Solutions CEO Barrett Burns said that the court’s decision confirms its longstanding allegation that FICO’s claims are “meritless,” and “at every step, VantageScore has prevailed against Fair Isaac’s claims.”

“Should FICO appeal, we remain confident we will prevail there too,” Burns said.

And FICO has the full intention of appealing, according to Craig Watts, a director of public affairs at Fair Issac. As to be expected, he said that FICO strongly disagrees with Montgomery’s verdict.

Watts added that the basic tenants of the case surround fairness and consumer protection, not against the numerical methodology for presenting that value, especially as it pertains to the sale of those scores to mortgage lenders, for example.

“Nothing has changed as a result of this order,” he said, “the defendants have not been held accountable for copying what it took FICO 20 years to build; and consumers will continue to be victims of big-budget ad campaigns that trick them into buying knock-off scores that they think are the genuine FICO scores lenders use to make decisions.”

Write to Richard Simpson at rsimpson2010@live.com

  • Last week I received an email from a desperate couple in Illinois. Here’s the edited version of their note:

“My wife and I have been struggling, morally, with what to do. We have two interest-only, adjustable-rate mortgages with two different lenders coming due in May of 2011. I currently can handle paying all my bills–but just barely, with nothing left over for replenishing of the emergency fund, or even my kids’ college savings.

In one year, when those adjustable rate mortgages adjust, it’s a different story. The home is now worth about 70% of the loan values. We do not want to stay in the home and have been trying to be proactive about doing something before the rates adjust. My lenders both said that if I do a short sale they would definitely make me sign a promissory note (for the deficiency). That defeats our purpose, so it is not an option for us. Bankruptcy attorneys have told me I make too much money to file for Chapter 7. I am currently employed. Last June I lost my previous job, and squandered our savings to stay above water with bills and the mortgages. Hindsight is 20/20 and at the time I should have filed for Chapter 7.

So, I am considering just letting the home go to foreclosure, saving my money, paying off other smaller debts (such as credit cards, and car loan), but am hesitant. I want/need to do the right thing fiscally for my family, but am wavering on the fence as to just take the plunge or not in a strategic foreclosure.

What should we do?”

These people are far from alone. Millions of middle-class Americans today are in a similar situation. They are struggling with their mortgage payments, and cannot sell because they are a long way underwater, owing more on their home than it is worth. They have wiped out their savings trying to keep up. One worker in six is either unemployed or underemployed, and there is a tsunami of rate resets coming in the next two years.

No one forced them to borrow –but no one forced the banks to lend either. More important right now is how they get out of it. I took this conundrum to two experienced bankruptcy attorneys–Richard Nemeth in Cleveland and Jeffrey Tromberg in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.–for their advice. Here are some thoughts they offered.

1. Put those suitcases down! Stop and take a deep breath. Sure, you could just walk away from the home today. There is a decent chance the banks won’t come after you for the shortfall either. And, as I’ve written before, the issue is not really a moral one. But you should first make sure you explore all your options to make sure you do it right.

2. Find out if you are eligible for help from the federal government. If your lender won’t modify the loan or agree to wipe out the deficiency through a short sale, Uncle Sam may still help you. The Making Home Affordable program was signed into law by President Obama last year. It hasn’t achieved as much as some may have hoped, but it has still helped some homeowners. The program offers mortgage modification and refinancing for some homeowners who are struggling, but there are conditions. The Department of Housing & Urban Development also offers help and advice on avoiding foreclosure: Details can be found here.

3. Get another legal opinion. You say you’ve spoken to bankruptcy attorneys, but were they specialists? Bankruptcy law in the U.S. like something out of Charles Dickens, even though it was just rewritten a few years ago. It’s convoluted, self-contradictory, and complex. The laws vary from state to state, and case law is changing almost weekly. It’s just five years since Congress passed sweeping legal changes, and many of the new rules are only getting road tested now. You may get different answers from different experts. Even those who pushed for the law, such as the lending industry, have been surprised at how some of it has worked out. It’s worth making sure your counsel knows the minutiae. The National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA.org) should be able to help you find a local specialist.

4. Double-check to see if you can still squeeze under the bar for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Chapter 7 is probably the simplest way to clear your debts, walk away and start again. I know you say you’ve been told that you earn too much to qualify. The 2005 law made qualification much tougher. But the new means test is actually far less restrictive than many people–including many attorneys–think. It allows some pretty generous exclusions from your gross income. You are, for example, allowed to deduct some pension and 401(k) contributions. You are also allowed to deduct charitable donations up to 15% of your gross income, though you have to demonstrate some history of these contributions. Make sure your counsel is experienced at bankruptcy filings and has fully explored how you might be able to make these work for you.

5. Realize that even if you can’t file now, that may change. The means test also excludes mortgage payments from your income. So even if you earn too much to file for Chapter 7 today you may do so when the mortgage rates reset. Mr. Nemeth says that the bankruptcy laws contain some peculiar loopholes you need to know about. For example, they may actually reward you for falling behind on your mortgage payments. That’s because your mortgage arrears will help reduce your effective income for the purposes of the means test–even if you plan to walk away from the home. Crazy? Yes. But blame the lenders. This is the law they, um, lobbied for.

6. Understand how a Chapter 13 might help you after all. Chapter 13 is “bankruptcy lite,” for those whose income is too high to qualify for a Chapter 7. It involves a debt repayment plan (it’s something like the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process used by corporations, though not as generous). In Chapter 13, the courts work out how much of your unsecured debts you can reasonably repay and set up a schedule to repay it.

Chapter 13 will not reduce the value of your primary mortgage. But make sure your counsel understands a little-known gap in the law that can help distressed homeowners who either have two mortgages, or one mortgage and a home equity line on top. If the property value has fallen so far that the primary mortgage is now under water, the courts can rule that the second mortgage is now an unsecured loan. And that, miraculously, means they can modify it. An example: You take out a $200,000 first mortgage and $50,000 second mortgage to buy a home for $250,000. The home then falls in value to $180,000. As that’s not even enough to cover the first mortgage completely, the second mortgage now has no collateral against it at all. The court, in most jurisdictions, can now modify that second mortgage the way they could other unsecured debt, such as a credit card payment.That could include reducing it to zero.

0316roi

0316roi

7. Keep contributing to your 401(k), IRA and 529 plans. It’s very easy in a crisis to stop thinking about the distant future. After all, you’ve got your hands full dealing with today. But this is a dangerous reaction. Why? Because money invested in a qualified retirement plan, and in 529 college savings plans under some circumstances, enjoy substantial legal privilege. They can be sheltered from creditors in bankruptcy. And the contributions may actually help you qualify for bankruptcy–as mentioned above. But the earlier you start making these contributions, and the longer you have been making them, the more respect the courts are likely to give them. Mr. Tromberg’s advice: “If both parents are working, I would contact the HR or 401(k) coordinator at work and say ‘I’d like to max out my contributions today.’”

8. If all else fails? There are not always easy answers. If there really is no way to make use of Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, you may indeed decide just to walk away from your mortgage and let the chips fall where they may. You have already made valiant efforts to keep up your payments. You are absolutely right to put your family’s finances first. But do explore the implications fully. Specialist knowledge can help. For example in some states the lenders have a very limited time to file legal papers for the arrears. And in many cases they are so swamped that they aren’t even bothering. And before walking you should also at least consider ceasing payments on your mortgage but staying in the home. Many mortgage lenders have made this crisis worse by refusing to sit down with borrowers to strike a deal. Alas, they may react better to a stopped check than a polite phone call.

Write to Richard Simpson for more information rsimpson2010@live.com

Facing foreclosure? 9 options

Check your options, get help, be realistic — and most of all, don’t dawdle.

Real estate markets are slowing. Interest rates are ticking up. And the phones are ringing at ByDesign, a Los Angeles-based credit counselor, as homeowners start to panic about not being able to make their mortgage payments.

“The number of people asking for appointments to talk about foreclosure is definitely up,” said Susan Ulaga, the nonprofit service’s senior vice president of counseling. Rising rates “are really putting a crunch” on homeowners with adjustable-rate loans.

Nearly a quarter of the nation’s mortgages have rates scheduled to reset this year or next, which means higher payments for millions of homeowners. How many will default isn’t known, but the Mortgage Bankers Association, which tracks delinquencies and foreclosures, expects a “modest” uptick in both by the end of the year.

If you’re in danger of falling behind on your mortgage, or if you’re already delinquent, it’s important to know what’s ahead and what your options are. Usually, the faster you move, the more choices you’ll have about your financial future.

The timeline

30 days: Your troubles actually start as soon as you miss a single payment. Lenders may not contact you until you’ve skipped a second payment, but most will report the first late payment and every subsequent delinquency to the credit bureaus. Even a single late payment can devastate your credit score, the three-digit number that lenders use to help gauge your creditworthiness. Each subsequent “late” further decreases your score, making it more difficult and expensive to get a loan or a refinance that might help your situation. In addition, lenders typically tack on late fees of 5% or so for each missed payment.

90 days to one year: Eventually, if the payments aren’t made, the lender will file a “notice of default” with a local courthouse and send you a letter saying that the foreclosure process will start unless you make good the missing payments.

Home financing © CorbisThe worst kind of debt: groceries

How quickly the notice is filed depends on the individual lender. Some hold off if you contact them to work out a payment plan or otherwise explain your situation. Others are more aggressive and start the process as soon as possible to try to protect their investment.

“They may do it as early as 90 days, or as late as a year,” explained Anthony Hsieh, president of LendingTree.com. “It really depends on the lender’s temperament.”

Usually, this notice means that the amount you owe has shot up as well, since the lender typically adds substantial fees to cover its legal costs.

The notice of default “is a big threshold,” Hsieh said. “Once you get into that state, it’s a whole different world. Your options are fewer.”

The notice of default is generally picked up by the credit bureaus, further depressing your credit score and making refinancing the loan extremely difficult.

(In addition, the notice tips off scam artists that you’re in trouble and may be vulnerable to various “equity skimming” schemes. One common ploy: The scam artist promises to take over your payments, but instead rents out your house and keeps the rent payments as pure profit. The home goes into foreclosure, your credit is trashed and you’ve lost any equity you had in the home.)

90 days more: Borrowers typically have 90 days from the notice of default to make up the deficit before the lender sends out a “notice of sale,” which sets a sale date for the house (typically within the next 15 to 30 days).

Some lenders will allow you to keep your original loan if you can make up the missing payments plus any late fees and legal charges. Others will insist you refinance with another lender. You can also halt the foreclosure, at least temporarily, by filing a lawsuit or filing for bankruptcy. For either legal option to work, you’ll have to be able to come up with a payment plan to fix the deficit.

Your options

Lenders today typically offer a variety of solutions for people who have fallen behind on their mortgages. Among them:
  • Temporarily reducing or waiving payments.

 

  • Setting up short-term repayment plans to help you make up the deficit.

 

  • Adding the unpaid balance to the principal of your loan and increasing your payments slightly to cover the extra amount.

Page 1 of 41234»